Spider Thompson: The X-Files of Digital Double Standards

Alright, you pixel-addicted reprobates, gather round while I carve open the rotting carcass of social media hypocrisy. I’ve been running my little experiment in the X swamp, and let me tell you, it’s a shitshow so rancid it’d make a sewer rat gag. I’m firing off an email to the X overlords after this, demanding they explain their broken system, but I’m not holding my breath – those suits are probably too busy polishing their algorithms to care. Here’s the deal: X is a rigged game, and the house always wins, especially if you’re a loudmouth grifter with a protected account. My experiment’s in two parts, both proving the same point: call out the clowns, get slapped with a ban, while they skate free, spewing lies and hate like it’s open mic night at the Bigot’s Ball.

Part One: The Tiny Criminal and His Enabler

First up, we’ve got @TRobinsonNewEra, the pint-sized felon fresh off a holiday in HMP for breaking a court order ten fucking times. Do the crime, do the time – fair play, right? He’s out now, strutting like he’s Nelson Mandela, and I, being the naïve bastard I am, drop a comment: “If you don’t wanna go to prison, stop breaking the law.” Basic logic, yeah? Apparently not. X slaps me with a “hateful content” report, locks my account, and forces me to delete the post to get back on. Here’s the kicker: they admit there’s no violation, but I still have to nuke my tweet. What the fuck? Since when is telling a crook to stay legal a crime? Meanwhile, this half-sized hooligan’s account is untouchable, like he’s got a digital forcefield. Protected class? Smells like it.

The next day, I spot @liamtuffs1, a scruffy YouTube grifter with his Dozen channel, dropping a teaser for his latest Tommy Robinson lovefest. It’s the same anti-Islam bullshit I already debunked—twisting a 2019 HMP Woodhill murder into a fantasy about “Muslim” inmates decapitating a Ukrainian with bedsheets. I laid it out in my last piece: the killers weren’t Muslim, the decapitation attempt failed, and the motive was just thug bravado, not jihad. Thirty seconds on Google proves it. So I report Tuffs to X, laying out the facts: he’s platforming a lie to incite fear and hatred, deliberately misrepresenting a real crime. X’s response? “After reviewing the available information, we want to let you know @liamtuffs1 hasn’t broken our safety policies.” Bullshit. X’s own rules flag promoting hate and misinformation as violations, but apparently, framing three random murderers as Islamic terrorists is just fine. Meanwhile, my “don’t break the law” quip? Straight to the gulag. Something’s rotten, and it ain’t just Tuffs’ beard.

Part Two: The Crypto Bro and the GDPR Dodge

Now for the accidental second act. Enter @nattyfried, a crypto bro who fancies himself the next Elon Musk, part of @Reform_UK’s “DOGE” crew – whatever the fuck that means. The story starts with @donmcgowan, one of the good guys, grilling Reform’s @ZiaYusufUK over their blatant GDPR breaches over the DOGE bullshit. Yusuf just blocks McGowan and scurries off. Enter Fried, who piles on, mocking McGowan’s site for needing GDPR compliance (it doesn’t, by the way) like it’s some online flex. However Reform’s website forces you to accept newsletters to sign petitions or register – illegal as hell under GDPR, which demands clear, optional consent for newsletter signups. I’ve been hounding @ICONews for months over this. This guy’s life is a grift, and he’s swinging at someone for daring to call out his paymasters.

I’m not having it. I fire back at Fried with a screenshot of Reform’s GDPR-violating website and tell him to ask his bosses why they treat data laws like optional trivia. An hour later – ping – X emails me: “Hi Spider Thompson, Your account, @SpiderDThompson, has been locked for violating the X Rules.” My crime? Calling out Fried’s hypocrisy. Apparently, his snowflake ego couldn’t handle the truth, so he reported me, and X rolled over like a trained dog. Meanwhile, Fried’s still prancing around, untouched, and Reform carries on flouting GDPR like it’s a suggestion box.

The Playbook of the Untouchable

This is the new game, folks. Back in the day, these clowns would sling “nonce” or “paedo enabler” at you, then block you to dodge the comeback. Same pricks crying “free speech” while silencing dissent. Now they’ve levelled up: call them out, and they report you, weaponizing X’s rules to scrub your posts and lock your account. Robinson lies about imaginary Muslim murderers? Crickets. Tuffs platforms that hate? All good. Fried attacks someone for exposing Reform’s illegal data practices? No problem. But me, telling a criminal to stay clean or pointing out GDPR violations? Banhammer. I’m locked out, forced to delete posts that X admits don’t break rules, while these grifters skate free, their lies and attacks racking up likes.

Social media’s fucked, and X is the ringleader. Why are some accounts bulletproof while the rest of us get screwed for speaking truth? Is it algorithms? Pay-to-play protection? Or just a broken system that rewards the loudest liars? I’m demanding answers from X, but I’m not betting on a reply. If I get one, you’ll see it plastered across my feed faster than you can say “double standards.” My experiment’s done, and the results are in: call a spade a spade, and you’re the one who gets buried. Stay sharp, you filthy lot – this ain’t over.

Spider Thompson, signing off with a Molotov cocktail for the digital dystopia.